• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Huddleston Tax CPAs | Accounting Firm In Seattle

Huddleston Tax CPAs | Accounting Firm In Seattle

  • Services
    • For Individuals
    • For Small Businesses
    • For Startups
  • Industry Expertise
  • Tax Guides
    • Self Employed
    • Rental Property
    • Offer In Compromise
    • City Tax
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Meeting Locations
    • Careers
    • Instructors at Small Business Webcast
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Client Portal

Seattle Council Member Proposes to Replace Regressive Water Tax with Capital Gains Tax

June 9, 2023 By john

Seattle Council member, Alex Pedersen, has proposed a plan to replace the city’s regressive water tax with a capital gains tax on high-income earners.

The water tax, which is currently 15.54%, is paid by all Seattle residents on their water bills. Pedersen argues that the tax is unfair because it disproportionately burdens low-income residents, who spend a larger percentage of their income on water bills.

The capital gains tax, which Pedersen proposes would be 2%, would only be paid by high-income earners who sell assets such as stocks or bonds for more than $250,000. Pedersen estimates that the tax would generate $50 million annually, which would be enough to offset the loss of revenue from the water tax.

Pedersen’s proposal has been met with mixed reactions. Some residents and businesses have praised the plan, saying that it would make the city’s tax system more fair. Others have criticized the plan, saying that it would discourage investment and economic growth.

The proposal is still in the early stages, and it is unclear whether it will be passed by the Seattle City Council.

Here are some of the arguments for and against Pedersen’s proposal:

Arguments in favor:

  • The water tax is regressive, meaning that it disproportionately burdens low-income residents.
  • The capital gains tax would be progressive, meaning that it would disproportionately burden high-income earners.
  • The capital gains tax would generate enough revenue to offset the loss of revenue from the water tax.
  • The capital gains tax would make the city’s tax system more fair.

Arguments against:

  • The capital gains tax could discourage investment and economic growth.
  • The capital gains tax could be difficult to administer and enforce.
  • The capital gains tax could be unfair to high-income earners who save for retirement by investing in stocks and bonds.

It is important to note that there is no consensus on whether Pedersen’s proposal is a good idea. The proposal is still in the early stages, and it is unclear whether it will be passed by the Seattle City Council.

Photo by Deborah L Carlson on Unsplash

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Contact

18208 66th Ave Ne, Ste 102
Kenmore, WA 98028
(425) 483-6600

Meeting Locations

Bellevue | Bothell | Issaquah
Kenmore | Kirkland
Seattle | University District
Copyright 2023 Huddleston Tax CPAs | Privacy Policy | FAQ