• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Huddleston Tax CPAs | Accounting Firm In Seattle

Huddleston Tax CPAs | Accounting Firm In Seattle

  • Tax Services
    • For Individuals
    • For Small Businesses
    • For Startups
  • Industry Expertise
  • Tax Guides
    • Self Employed
    • Rental Property
    • Offer In Compromise
    • City Tax
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Meeting Locations
    • Careers
    • Instructors at Small Business Webcast
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Client Portal

court case

close up of a row of law books

April 25, 2025 By john

Starker v. United States: Section 1031 Exchanges

Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code has long been a cornerstone of tax planning for real estate investors, enabling them to defer capital gains taxes when exchanging like-kind properties. While this provision encourages reinvestment and stimulates economic growth, it also requires strict

Filed Under: court case

house with a sign out front that says under contract

April 19, 2025 By john

What Conklin v. Davi Can Teach Modern Buyers About Marketable Title and Adverse Possession

In today’s fast-paced real estate market, where digital listings, bidding wars, and off-market deals are more common than ever, one truth remains timeless: a well-written contract is your best protection. The 1978 case of Conklin v. Davi might be decades old, but its lesson is more relevant than

Filed Under: court case

a key dangling off a moving box

April 18, 2025 By john

Kirksey v Kirksey: A Case Considerably Lacking in Consideration

Contract law exists to help us determine when promises are legally binding and enforceable. At its core, a contract requires several key elements to be valid: offer, acceptance, consideration, legality, capacity, and (in certain cases) a written agreement. If even one of these is missing, the whole

Filed Under: court case

close up of hand over a laptop with a screen on a revenue form

December 28, 2024 By john

The Physical Presence Standard: Quill Corp v. North Dakota

Before the explosion of e-commerce, businesses relied on clear, straightforward rules for collecting state sales tax. One of the most significant cases to establish such a rule was Quill Corp v. North Dakota (1992). This decision cemented the "physical presence" standard for state tax collection,

Filed Under: court case

calculators, pens and binders stacked that say income tax

December 22, 2024 By john

The Sixteenth Amendment and the Landmark Case of Kornfeld v. Commissioner

The Sixteenth Amendment, ratified in 1913, fundamentally changed the U.S. tax system by granting Congress the authority to levy income taxes directly. It states: “Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the

Filed Under: court case

close up of an open laptop with a small box that reads online shopping

December 16, 2024 By john

Let’s Talk Online Sales Tax: South Dakota v Wayfair

The way we shop has transformed dramatically in the digital age, but until recently, the laws governing online sales tax lagged behind. Enter South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (2018), a groundbreaking case that redefined the landscape of e-commerce taxation in the United States. This decision overturned

Filed Under: court case

packages left outside door in a long hallway

December 14, 2024 By john

Hadley v Baxendale: The Case of Unforeseen Damages

Despite the United States striving to differentiate itself from British traditions, echoes of the British legal system resonate strongly in our own. One prime example is the seminal case of Hadley v Baxendale (1854), an English contract law case that established the principle of foreseeability in

Filed Under: court case

A couple shaking hands with someone across a table.

November 22, 2024 By john

The Benefit Detriment Theory: Hammer vs Sidway

Contract law is continually evolving so courts can decipher the purpose and intent of these contracts. This is where the benefit detriment theory comes in. A substantial agreement must exist and the parties must have freely intended to be legally bound. For instance, if a client offers your

Filed Under: court case

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Contact

18208 66th Ave Ne, Ste 100
Kenmore, WA 98028
(425) 483-6600

Meeting Locations

Bellevue | Bothell | Issaquah
Kenmore | Kirkland
Seattle | University District
Copyright 2025 Huddleston Tax CPAs | Privacy Policy | FAQ